You Pay No Fee Until We Win

Here to Help 24/7. Current wait time 22 seconds.

Strange But True: Personal Injury Cases Resulting from Lawnmower Accidents

Precise green stripes, a rolling carpet of soft grass, and the smell of freshly cut clippings.  A well-maintained lawn is an American fixture, and from coast to coast and border to border, you can find neatly manicured yards stretching across suburbia.  The perfect lawn couldn’t be the phenomenon that it is without constant mowing.  But are mowers a useful tool, or a necessary evil? Lawnmowers cause numerous accidents every year, and with summer kicking into gear, the season for lawnmower injuries is upon us.  In this entry of our Strange But True blog series, we’ll be taking a look at personal injury cases from lawnmower accidents.

Lawnmower - Strange But True: Personal Injury Cases Resulting from Lawnmower Accidents

253,000 Lawnmower Injuries in 2010 Alone

When we talk about kitchen safety, there’s one appliance we pay special attention: the blender. That’s because blenders feature razor-sharp blades that spin at extremely high speeds, and the potential for terrible injury is obvious.  Fortunately, blenders are small and stationary, and a simple lid is sufficient to prevent accidents.

Now imagine that your blender is enormous, and you’re muscling it across a lumpy, uneven swath of thick grass that could be concealing anything.

What you’re left with is a lawnmower.

Of course, that’s a simplification; but a lawnmower is a huge, heavy, powerful set of rapidly-moving blades.  It’s all too easy to be seriously hurt — or killed.

How easy may surprise you.  According to the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission, on an annual basis, roughly:

  • 800 children will be hit or run over.
  • 75 people will be killed.

The Commission also reported 253,000 lawnmower injuries in 2010 alone.  Among them, 17,000 affected people under 19 years old.

According to the Amputee Coalition of America, a yearly average of 600 children will have to have an amputation as a result of a lawnmower accident.  In fact, the Coalition reports that lawnmowers are the number one cause of major amputations for children under ten years old.

If  none of those statistics are frightening enough, consider this sobering statement from the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: “The energy transferred by a typical lawn mower blade is equivalent to being shot in the hand with a .357 magnum pistol.”

Lawnmower 2 - Strange But True: Personal Injury Cases Resulting from Lawnmower Accidents

Zero Turn Radius (ZTR) Mower Rollover Accidents

You would think where such a dangerous product is concerned, every possible safety precaution would be taken by designers and manufacturers.  Unfortunately, you would be mistaken.  Certain types of lawnmowers and mower features have been repeatedly identified as serious safety hazards, yet continue to be readily available in the consumer market.

Zero Turn Radius (ZTR) mowers are prized for their precision maneuverability.  Unfortunately, the same technology that enables such tight, responsive turning is also to blame for a high risk of rollover.

It doesn’t take much to knock a ZTR mower off of its “feet.”  Even tiny inconsistencies like small holes or shallow grades, which common in any lawn, can interfere with ZTR mower stability. Furthermore, many ZTR mowers are equipped with drum brakes which are located on the rear axle, when disc brakes on the front would provide far better sudden braking ability.

Manufacturers are aware that ZTR mowers can be tricky to handle and have a tendency to roll easily.  For this reason, some of them have outfitted their products with Rollover Protection Systems — but not all.  The technologies exist, and the mower manufacturers are aware of the risks to consumers, yet ROPS is not always in place.

Danger - Strange But True: Personal Injury Cases Resulting from Lawnmower Accidents

Major Lawnmower Recalls

Considering the sky-high numbers of lawnmower injuries that happen every year, it comes as little surprise that lawnmower accidents and defects have led to numerous recalls and lawsuits.

In January of 2014, Honda recalled over 20,000 units in the United States.  The models affected by the recall included the HRR2169VLA and the HRX2174VLA.  It was determined that blades in the mower would continue to rotate even after the control lever was released.

The Toro Company recalled almost 4,000 units of its Toro Z Master Commercial 2000 Series after receiving half a dozen reports of friction between a pulley and the fuel tank.  This design oversight could have created a potentially explosive fire hazard for innocent riders.

The Toro Company has had other run-ins with recalls as well.  In December of 2013, nearly 35,000 units in the U.S. were included in a recall of TimeMaster and TurfMaster mowers when it was determined that the mower’s blades could easily break.  Ten reports of broken blades were received.

Manufactured by Excel Industries, approximately 3,700 Hustler and Big Dog riding mowers were recalled after it was discovered that these models could continue to operate even after the rider dismounted the vehicle.

In the case of Purdy v. Deere, which was filed as recently as April of 2014, the plaintiff alleged that a safety feature had failed.  Dwight Purdy stated he had accidentally backed over his daughter, causing severe injury, after accidentally overriding a critical “no mow in reverse” safety feature. Purdy asserted that the product was negligently designed.

While the judge ruled in favor of the defendant following an initial trial and appeal, the Oregon Supreme Court is now reconsidering Purdy’s case.

If you or someone you love has been injured by a defective or negligently designed lawnmower or riding mower, you may have a strong case for a defective product claim.  To schedule a free consultation with an experienced personal injury attorney, call the law offices of The Reiff Law Firm at (215) 709-6940, or contact us online today.

  • Share your experience
    we will call you back with a free case review

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.