Pennsylvania Survival Statute Compared to the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death Statute

“The Best Lawyer I've Ever Had. I was a client who was helped by Jeffrey Reiff. He was an excellent attorney that went above and beyond all means to make sure that I got the maximum amount for my auto accident. The case I had was settled with an amount that even I couldn't believe I was getting. He is truly a wonderful and pleasant man...”

Read more Avvo Reviews

Our Results

$13 Million

Auto Defect

$8 Million

Auto Defect

$7.1 Million

Wrongful Death from a DUI Accident

$5.7 Million

Medical Malpractice

SEE MORE RESULTS Call Today
(215) 246-9000

As Seen In

Many people are surprised to discover the Pennsylvania law recognizes not one, but two types of actions that can be brought following the death of a family member or loved one due to negligence or an intentional tort. Pennsylvania courts have long recognized that a person who is injured as a result of another’s negligence or other conduct is entitled to relief.  Pennsylvania law makes both survival actions and wrongful death actions available. However, each type of action is appropriate for its own set of circumstances. In this blog post, a Philadelphia wrongful death attorney will explore the Pennsylvania Survival statute as it compares to the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death statute. 

Survival Actions and their History

The Pennsylvania Constitution provides that in the case of death from personal injury, the right of action survives. The Pennsylvania Constitution also provides that except in workmen’s compensation cases, the General Assembly may not limit the amount to be recovered for injuries resulting in death. See Pa. Const. Art. III, § 18. Pennsylvania survival statute states in its entirety:

All causes of action or proceedings, real or personal, shall survive the death of the plaintiff or of the defendant, or the death of one or more joint plaintiffs or defendants.

exploding battery lawyer

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 8302. To immediately distinguish this cause of action from that of wrongful death, this cause of action is grounded in the injury to the other person, not in the fact that he or she may have died. Therefore, a survival action continues in the decedent’s personal representative. This cause of action provides a means for an aggrieved personal representative to assert causes of action that the decedent (the party who has died) would have had been entitled to had he or she survived the incident or act. The damages stem from the rights of action possessed by the decedent at the time of death. See Frey v. Pennsylvania Elec. Co., 607 A.2d 796, 798 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992), appeal denied, 614 A.2d 1142 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992).

Who Is Eligible to Bring a Wrongful Death or Survival Action? 

In Pennsylvania, a survival action is brought by the personal representative of the decedent’s estate in order to recover the loss to the decedent’s estate resulting from the defendant’s tort or crime.  In a survival action, the personal representative, administrator, administratrix, executor, or executrix of the decedent’s estate may bring the survival action arising from an accidental or wrongful death.

What Damages Are Available in Survival and Wrongful Death Actions?

The damages awarded in a survival action include the decedent’s pain and suffering, the loss of gross earning power from the date of injury until death minus personal maintenance expenses, from the time of death through the decedent’s estimated lifespan. See Kiser v. Schulte, 648 A.2d 1, 4 (Pa. 1994).

However, it is well-settled law in Pennsylvania that damages for pain and suffering are not always available depending on the factual determinations made. In order for there to be damages for pain and suffering in a survival action, the plaintiff must consciously feel pain and suffer from it. When the decedent plaintiff is killed instantly or is unconscious the entire time following accident and injury, there can be no recovery for pain and suffering. Nye v. Comm., Dept. of Transp. 331 Pa. Super. 209, 213 (1984).

Generally, a survival action is brought by the administrator of the decedent’s estate to recover for losses to the estate resulting from a defendant’s tort. The damages in a survival action are measured by the pecuniary loss to the decedent. See Miller v. the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 450 A.2d 91, 95 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982), aff’d, 468 A.2d 1097 (Pa. 1983).  Economic damages, on the other hand, are measured by the loss of earning power minus personal maintenance expenses from the time of death through a decedent’s estimated working lifespan. While it may seem that there is a considerable amount of math involved, neither the statute nor the case law requires that there be a mathematical exactness; merely that the person who is bringing the claim provide evidence of a reasonably fair basis for calculating damages. See Smail v. Flock, 180 A.2d 59, 61 (Pa. 1962).

The damages that a personal representative can recover on behalf of their departed loved one include medical bills, the decedent’s conscious pain and suffering, and the decedent’s probable lifetime earnings, less his or her probable lifetime costs of maintenance. See Skoda v. West Penn Power Co., 191 A.2d 822, 829 (Pa. 1963). In a survival action the case of Krause v. B & O R.R. provides that when the survival claim is based on the estate’s loss of the decedent’s earnings during their normal life expectancy, these earnings must be reduced by a number of probable money contributions awarded to any wrongful death beneficiaries. This priority in how funds are to be allocated is reinforced by the natural preference for compensation, recognizing that wrongful death claims are more favored over survival claims. See Generally Krause v. B & O R.R., Pa. D. & C. 3d 458, 471 (C.P. Ct. Somerset Cnty. December 7, 1983).

Philadelphia wrongful death attorney

Some notable differences in recoverable damages between a wrongful death action and a survival action prohibit claimants from recovering the costs of a funeral. See Skoda v. West Penn Power Co., 191 A.2d 822, 829 (Pa. 1963). Additionally, there can be no recovery for pain and suffering when the decedent is unconscious for the entire period of time of the injury and the time of death according to the case of Nye v. Commonwealth, 480 A.2d 318, 321 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1984).

What is the Statute of Limitations for a Survival Action?

As with all causes of action in Pennsylvania, there is a finite amount of time in which an aggrieved party may file their claim. A survival action must be filed within two years of the date of injury. 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2). Accordingly, while a wrongful death action accrues on the date of death, it is important to realize that a survival action may accrue prior to the date of death and thus on a different date than the wrongful death action. Speak to a Pennsylvania workplace wrongful death lawyer of The Reiff Law Firm if you have questions regarding your wrongful death case.

Call a Philadelphia Wrongful Death Lawyer

A lawsuit which pleads a cause of action under both wrongful death and the survival act can result in a settlement or jury award that compensates you for your economic losses and the pain and suffering experienced by your loved one or family member. However, it is essential to note that, “the actions for damages are cumulative and are not to overlap or result in duplication of damages.” Kiser v. Schulte 648 A.2d 1 (Pa. 1994).

To schedule a free consultation for your injury case, call us at (215) 246-9000, or contact us online.

best philadelphia personal injury lawyer best philadelphia personal injury lawyers best philadelphia personal injury attorney best philadelphia personal injury attorneys best personal injury lawyer best personal injury lawyers Philadelphia personal injury attorneys best personal injury attorneys best personal injury attorney Philadelphia best personal injury attorneys Philadelphia best personal injury lawyer Philadelphia best personal injury lawyers Philadelphia

Free Consultation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.